Subset-Selectivity and Distractor Matching in Visual Conjunction Search

Abstract

In search for a conjunction of color and orientation, Theeuwes, Kaptein and Van der Heijden (1993) obtained target absent responses that were in some conditions faster and in other conditions slower than target present responses. In addition, target absent search function slopes were shallower than target present slopes. These findings cannot be explained by present conjunction search theories. Since in the same study Theeuwes et al. demonstrated subset- selectivity in conjunction search, the interdependence of the fast absent responses and subset-selective search needed to be assessed. The present study shows that subset-selective search is independent of the occurrence of fast absent responses. Experiment 1 replicated the findings of Theeuwes et al. (1993) . Experiment 2 showed that the fast absents were not the result of a response bias. The results of Experiments 3 and 4 showed that the fast absents can be explained by a weak, parallel distractor matching process that enables responding 'target absent' if all relevant distractor elements are similar. Since this process is easily disturbed, the absence of a sameness-signal can not be used for 'target present' decisions. It is argued that both subset-selective search and distractor matching may have unnotedly occurred in previously reported experiments.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 25, 1994
Accession Number
ADA285137

Entities

People

  • J. Theeuwes
  • N. A. Kaptein

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Competition
  • Computers
  • Error Analysis
  • Errors
  • False Alarms
  • Heterogeneous Conditions
  • Information Processing
  • Linear Regression Analysis
  • Parallel Computing
  • Parallel Processing
  • Psychology
  • Reaction Time
  • Regression Analysis
  • Search Theory
  • Standards
  • Warning Systems

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Regression Analysis.
  • Vision Science/Vision Psychology/Cognitive Neuroscience.