Alternate Dispute Resolution.

Abstract

In an effort to save taxpayer dollars and ease an overburdened administrative and judicial court system, this report presents evidence to encourage the use of alternate dispute resolution (ADR) in construction contracting within the Naval Facilities Engineering Cornmand. Information is presented detailing the primary factors that contribute to this expensive and overburdened system, including: costs associated with litigation, contractual document formation, experience level of junior project managers, and adversarial relationships that tend to develop between government agencies and construction contractors. Research on court cases and associated cost data was limited by geographic region, specifically, the Southern Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Charleston, South Carolina. Also included is related information from the Department of Defense administrative hearing agency and the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 1994
Accession Number
ADA289650

Entities

People

  • Paul F. Webb

Organizations

  • Texas A&M University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Agreements
  • Air Force
  • Attorneys
  • Congress
  • Contracts
  • Department Of Defense
  • Geographic Regions
  • Judiciary
  • Materials
  • National Governments
  • Negotiations
  • Personnel Management
  • Procurement
  • Recognition
  • Total Quality Management
  • United States
  • United States Government

Readers

  • Criminal Law
  • Facility/Structural Engineering.
  • Government Contracting/Procurement.