Educational Benefits Versus Enlistment Bonuses: A Comparison of Recruiting Options.

Abstract

Effective management of recruiting resources requires information on the relative cost-effectiveness of alternative methods of enhancing enlisted supply. Two key recruiting policy options are enlistment bonuses and post-service educational benefits. While numerous studies have examined the effects of these programs on enlistment outcomes, less is known about how these options affect the service history of recruits. The incentives embedded in the programs, the structure of the programs, and the types of recruits systematically drawn in by these programs may result in these benefits' significantly altering the attrition, retention, and reserve component accession rates of recruits. Such effects could dramatically influence estimated per-man-year costs of these recruiting programs. As a result, cost- effectiveness comparisons based on the enlistment effects of each program could provide only a partial picture of the programs' effects. For example, educational benefits could induce enlistees to leave after their first term but could also induce them to become part of the reserve force later. An examination of enlistment effects only rather than total force effects would provide a misleading comparison between educational benefits and bonuses.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1994
Accession Number
ADA291829

Entities

People

  • Beth J. Asch
  • James N. Dertouzos

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Active Duty
  • Attrition
  • Basic Training
  • Computer Programming
  • Cost Effectiveness
  • Education
  • Enlisted Personnel
  • Experimental Design
  • Military Research
  • National Guard
  • National Security
  • Public Policy
  • Recruiting
  • Recruits
  • Reenlistment
  • Social Sciences
  • Training

Readers

  • Economics
  • Naval Personnel Management