A Methodology for Evaluating Military Systems in a Counterproliferation Role.

Abstract

This thesis develops a methodology to evaluate how dissimilar military systems support the accomplishment of the United States? counterproliferation objectives. The overall scope is to develop a model of the counterproliferation decision process that enables systems to be evaluated against common criteria. By using decision analysis, a influence diagram model is developed which represents military activities in the counterproliferation process. The key questions which must be asked in evaluating counterproliferation systems are highlighted. An analysis of perfect intelligence, perfect defensive, and perfect offensive systems reveal that a perfect intelligence system provides the greatest potential to meet the United States' counterproliferation objectives. Sensitivity analysis is conducted to determine which factors in the model are mode important. To demonstrate the model, nine systems from the Air Force wargame Vulcan's Forge 1995 are evaluated. The results are used to demonstrate the type of analysis which can be performed to evaluate U.S. counterproliferation systems.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 1995
Accession Number
ADA293876

Entities

People

  • Stanley Stafira Jr

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Aircrafts
  • Altitude
  • Artificial Satellites
  • Ballistic Missiles
  • Battle Damage Assessment
  • Biological Weapons
  • Computer Programs
  • Computers
  • Defense Systems
  • Department Of Defense
  • Detection
  • Directed Energy Weapons
  • Military Capabilities
  • Operations Research
  • Security
  • Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Readers

  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Strategic Security Studies
  • Team-Based Human-Centered Cognitive Task Decision Making and Information Performance.