Navy Laboratories: Issues Concerning the Naval Undersea Warfare Center's Suffolk Facility.

Abstract

Briefly stated, our work showed that the original l9X7 justification for the building did reflect a desire to consolidate existing lease spaces and a growing workload, However, by the time the lease was signed, this growth had begun to overlap with Navy downsizing--including downsizing of the Norfolk detachment. The decision to build a new facility for long-term lease at that time was not a wise one. Other than informal discussions, we found no indication that other options were considered for acquiring space for a smaller detachment. In fact, according to General Services Administration (GSA) officials, the Navy could have canceled the lease even after construction began--a final option that also was not considered. As a result, unnecessary lease costs will be avoided only if tentative arrangements to have the lease taken over by another group are carried out on schedule. In addition to lease costs, the Navy incurred over $9 million in one- time relocation costs.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 22, 1994
Accession Number
ADA296562

Entities

Organizations

  • United States Government Accountability Office

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Base Closures
  • Construction
  • Engineering
  • Military Downsizing
  • Military Organizations
  • National Security
  • Naval Operations
  • Navy
  • Relocation
  • Rhode Island
  • Systems Engineering
  • Undersea Warfare
  • United States
  • Warfare
  • Workload

Readers

  • Government Contracting/Procurement.
  • Maritime and Naval Warfare Studies
  • Systems Analysis and Design

Technology Areas

  • Space