Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis: A Comparison of Civil War Commanders in Chief.

Abstract

This is a study of the effectiveness of Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis as Commanders in Chief during the Civil War. It begins by comparing their backgrounds prior to assuming the Presidency; then comparing their military strategies and command structures. The final area of comparison is their involvement in the first military draft in American history. Davis bad extensive government and military experience, but exhibited personality traits early on that later hampered his performance as a war-time Commander in Chief. Lincoln had very little experience, but excelled at dealing with people. Lincoln tried -several staff arrangements before finally appointing Grant as General in Chief. Davis changed his structure very little throughout the war. Although he appointed Lee as General in Chief in the first year, he lost his services by placing him in command of a field army. Both faced strong challenges from a powerful governor over the draft. Davis first tried to win over the governor, then appealed directly to the people. Lincoln publicly kept distant fran the draft and worked behind the scenes.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 02, 1995
Accession Number
ADA299295

Entities

People

  • Michael S. Trench

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Army
  • Civil War
  • Congress
  • Governments
  • Law
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • Military Strategy
  • National Governments
  • National Security
  • Personality
  • Personnel Management
  • State Governments
  • United States
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • History

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.