Army Airspace Command and Control (A2 C2) and the Contingency Tactical Air Control System Automated Planning System (CTAPS): Is There a Joint Method to this Parochial Madness?

Abstract

In a theater of operations, Army access to airspace not under its direct control is difficult to obtain. The increasing number of intelligence, aviation, and long range fires systems organic to the Army, that require the routine use of airspace above the coordination altitude and beyond the fire support coordination line (FSCL), require greater and easier access to airspace usually controlled by the joint forces air component commander (JFACC). Without this access, critical intelligence collection requirements go unanswered, and Army aircraft readiness rates are lowered because of limitations to test flights and the slower delivery of repair parts. The processes and procedures that do exist are the result of after thought and workarounds. Doctrine dealing with the issue is vague and sometimes contradictory. An examination airspace command and control in a wartime theater of operations is undertaken using the Training and Doctrine Command's (TRADOC) doctrine, training, leadership development, organization, material, and soldiers (DTLOMS) model. The doctrinal evaluation includes a review of Army, joint and Air Force publications dealing with requests for Army use of airspace not under its direct control. Key players and their responsibilities are identified upon creation of ajoint task force (JTF), and the subsequent appointment of a JFACC. Deficiencies in training, leadership development, organization, material, and soldier utilization are discussed as they apply to the current A C and battlefield coordination element (BCE) structures. A2C2 lessons learned and recently published periodicals are examined from operations JUST CAUSE, DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM, and from joint exercises since then. The difficulty Army assets experience accessing joint airspace is well documented and, for the most part, remains unchanged. The difficulties and general lack of familiarit

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 23, 1995
Accession Number
ADA314281

Entities

People

  • Michael W. Drumm

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Human Systems
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Aircraft Equipment
  • Aircrafts
  • Airframes
  • Army Aircraft
  • Command And Control
  • Command And Control Systems
  • Control Systems
  • Fixed Wing Aircraft
  • Military Organizations
  • National Security
  • Remotely Piloted Vehicles
  • Rotary Wing Aircraft
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3
  • Fully Networked C3 - Command and Control
  • Space