A Comparative Analysis of Two Alternatives to Chemical Aircraft Paint Stripping.

Abstract

The Air Force must periodically strip and paint its aircraft to prevent the damaging effects of corrosion. The paint removal process typically involves the use of toxic chemicals such as methylene chloride which are soon to be banned as a result of impending environmental regulations and increased costs associated with handling and disposing of such material. The Air Force must choose an alternative to methylene chloride chemical stripping which complies with environmental regulations and reduces costs. This thesis compares the life cycle costs and environmental impacts of two alternatives to chemical aircraft stripping. Plastic Media Blasting (PMB) and Modified Medium Pressure Water (MPW) are compared based on stripping a C-l30 aircraft by the PMB process at the Lockheed Aircraft Service Center in Ontario, CA and the MPW process by Warner-Robins AFB, GA. The results of the study indicate that MPW has the lower life cycle costs.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1996
Accession Number
ADA325115

Entities

People

  • George P. Joyce Ii

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Biomedical
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerospace Industry
  • Air Force
  • Air Pollutants
  • Aircraft Industry
  • Aircrafts
  • Chemical Synthesis
  • Chemistry
  • Chlorides
  • Civil Engineering
  • Corrosion
  • Costs
  • Engineers
  • Environment
  • Environmental Protection
  • Law
  • Materials
  • Volatile Organic Compounds

Fields of Study

  • Environmental science

Readers

  • Environmental Engineering.
  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis
  • Surface Coatings Technology.