Measuring Operational Success: Establishing Criteria to Benchmark the Point of Culmination.

Abstract

This paper specifies a descriptive methodology for analyzing military missions. More specifically, it identifies the apparent disregard that US doctrine has for the establishment of criteria that measure operational success on the battlefield. This void, in-turn, impacts directly on the operational commander's capability to identify his point(s) of culmination. Numerous studies exist describing how to identify a culmination point so that one can know when to bring the battle to fruition. What is lacking, however, is the matching of criteria with objectives at every level of war to determine what the measurement is that ultimately defines victory. Therefore, there is no method to benchmark the culminating point prior to battle. This paper will first explore the Clausewitzian 'contradictory nature of war' and then (1) establish a methodology for defining measurable objectives at the operational level of war and (2) correspondingly define guidelines for establishing discernible criteria that will benchmark not only the success of the objectives but also the point of culmination.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 07, 1997
Accession Number
ADA325136

Entities

People

  • Dominic J. Caraccilo

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Classification
  • Command And Control
  • Command And Control Systems
  • Department Of Defense
  • Doctrine
  • Governments
  • Hierarchies
  • Military Applications
  • Military Operations
  • Operations Research
  • Persian Gulf
  • Rhode Island
  • Schools
  • Systems Engineering
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Systems Analysis and Design