Incremental Validity of Experimental Computerized Tests for Predicting Training Criteria in Military Technical Schools.

Abstract

This report presents analyses of two previously collected data sets to determine the increase in validity from adding new computerized aptitude tests to the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB). The first data set contained test measurements on technical training students from only the Navy, and used an experimental battery called the Computerized Test Battery (CTB) along with the ASVAB. The second data set consisted of tests of students in the Army, Navy, and Air Force using the Enhanced Computer Administered Tests (ECAT) and the ASVAB. The study investigated the incremental validity of individual experimental tests, composites of experimental tests, and estimates of which were based on the experimental tests. Conclusions: (1) The Assembling Objects and Two-Hand Tracking tests can outperform some ASVAB tests in predicting school criteria as measured primarily by Final School Grade (FSG). (2) While the ECAT and CTB tests provide a relatively small amount of incremental validity over the ASVAB when averaged across schools, they provide substantial validity gains for some of the schools. (3) The ECAT Spatial dimension is the most promising dimension for increasing FSG validity over the ASVAB.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 01, 1993
Accession Number
ADA326323

Entities

People

  • Darlene R. Cole
  • Jeffrey W. Kusulas
  • John J. Pass
  • Norm M. Abrahams
  • William F. Kieckhaefer

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Composite Materials
  • Computers
  • Data Sets
  • Department Of Defense
  • Descriptive Analytics
  • Employment
  • Enlisted Personnel
  • Factor Analysis
  • Measurement
  • Military Personnel
  • Personnel Management
  • Personnel Selection
  • Psychological Tests
  • Psychology
  • Regression Analysis
  • Training

Fields of Study

  • Education

Readers

  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Mechanical Engineering/Mechanics of Materials.