Can the U.S. Adequately Protect Its Forces?

Abstract

There are those who believe that if they can cause enough casualties or threats of casualties to U.S. forces, they can weaken support in the U.S. for our presence in the region or weaken support in the host nations for a continued U.S. presence. This approach worked for terrorists when they attacked U.S. forces in Beirut in 1983 because our objectives for being there were unclear. Terrorists were not successful after attacking Khobar Towers because the U.S. has strategic interests in maintaining a force presence in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf region and in conducting coalition military operations to contain regional aggression. A military presence demonstrates U.S. commitment to the security of our friends and allies in the region and grants the U.S. access to critical facilities needed to defend its vital interests. In order for the U.S. to continue to protect its vital interests in the region, the U.S. must develop better and more efficient ways of protecting its forces and making these forces less vulnerable to terrorist attack. Fusion cells will provide operational and tactical commanders with timely intelligence which may help them better prepare for terrorist attacks. The services and allied forces need to unify their force protection efforts to combat the terrorist threat. Force protection information must be shared by all commands. The U.S. must continue to look for ways to reduce U.S. force vulnerability to terrorist attack. Improvements for physical security have been made, but the best solution is to reduce the number of U.S. forces overseas. We can do that now through effectively and efficiently employing our expeditionary forces. Through these measures, the U.S. can combat the terrorist threat while continuing to protect its vital interests around the world, and at the same tine protecting its most vital resource - the American fighting man and woman.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 13, 1997
Accession Number
ADA328095

Entities

People

  • Dale Pangman

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Carrier Based Aircraft
  • Command And Control
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Department Of Defense
  • Force Protection
  • Human Intelligence
  • Military Operations
  • National Security
  • Task Forces
  • Terrorism
  • Terrorists
  • United States
  • United States Central Command
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • East Asian Political and Security Studies within the Soviet Union
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Political Violence and Terrorism Studies.