Are Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentences Cost-Effective?

Abstract

Mandatory minimum sentencing laws have been among the more popular crime-fighting measures of n recent years. Such laws require that a judge impose a sentence of at least a specified length if certain criteria are met. For example, a person convicted by a federal court of possessing half a kilogram or more of cocaine powder a must be sentenced to at least five years in prison. Mandatory minimums have enjoyed strong bipartisan support. To proponents, their certainty and severity help ensure that incarceration's goals will be achieved. Those A goals include punishing the convicted and keeping them from committing more crimes for a period of time, as well as deterring others not in prison from committing similar crimes. Critics, however, believe that mandatory minimums foreclose discretionary judgment where it may most be needed, and they fear these laws result in instances of unjust punishment.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1997
Accession Number
ADA330359

Entities

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Cost Effectiveness
  • Costs
  • Crime
  • Criminal Justice System
  • Governments
  • Imprisonment
  • Public Policy
  • Sentence (Law)
  • United States
  • World Wide Web

Readers

  • Criminal Law
  • Government and Public Administration Law.
  • Political Violence and Terrorism Studies.