Airpower and Ground Armies. Essays on the Evolution of Anglo-American Air Doctrine 194O-1943,

Abstract

Long before the current struggle between the Army and Air Force over the deep attack mission, the services debated employment of air resources. Among the earliest roles and missions issues of the 193Os, the Army argued that ground commanders needed to control air resources for "unity of command" principles. Airmen countered by citing "centralized control" principles. Historians have often suggested that the issue of centralized command was settled by the Battle of Kasserine Pass early in World War II. Continued research has shown that the centralized air command, as well as air superiority, was well established in published doctrine several years before World War II. Nevertheless, Mrica was argued to be an effective testing ground even though it could hardly fill that role because of the immaturity of operations at that time. No one was arguing that support of land operations was an inappropriate role for airpower. The argument was how to carry out that task.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1998
Accession Number
ADA338777

Entities

People

  • Daniel R. Mortensen

Organizations

  • Air University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerial Warfare
  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Aircraft Industry
  • Aircrafts
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Employment
  • Fighter Aircraft
  • Geography
  • Military Aviation
  • Military History
  • Military Organizations
  • Second World War
  • Tactical Air Support
  • Teamwork
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.