Democracy and the Military: Are Civil-Military Relations Deteriorating?

Abstract

Professors Gregory D. Foster and Richard H. Kohn suggest in their writings that there is a crisis in civil-military relations. Collectively, they believe that the military has become too politicized, there is a growing disparity between society and the military, and too much military power had been given to the military, particularly the Joint Staff and the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff. The paper explores these notions by examining the civilian control of political decisions affecting the military. It also explores possible civilian involvement at the operational level and relations with society. Finally, it examines briefly what civil-military relations were like during the Vietnam War and Persian Gulf War. The conclusion is that civil-military relations are not in a crisis today nor were they in a crisis during the Gulf War. Civil-military relations during the Vietnam War were, however, in a crisis.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 25, 1998
Accession Number
ADA339174

Entities

People

  • Charles E. Davis

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Congress
  • Department Of Defense
  • Employment
  • Geography
  • Governments
  • Military Acquisition
  • Military Operations
  • Military Personnel
  • Military Strategy
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • New York
  • Persian Gulf
  • Personnel Management
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.