Sustaining America's Strategic Deterrent Forces in the 21st Century,

Abstract

Sustainment of an effective strategic nuclear deterrent can be best summed up as follows: We are planning for small levels of real growth-less than one percent-in the defense budget, but mindful of the need to maintain a hedging fiscal posture for sustaining our existing systems; We need to leverage off of commercial and other defense investment in common industrial capabilities to sustain our strategic forces; We must focus on implementing lasting acquisition and security reforms to open the defense market to commercial technology and processes. As we move through today's agenda, I believe these points will continue to surface as recurring themes. I recognize that unique strategic systems requirements, and the defense unique industrial capabilities needed to meet these requirements, cannot be eliminated entirely. We need to work together, to minimize the disproportionate costs of defense unique solutions. In this way, we can ensure that we sustain the robust, innovative defense industrial structure needed to maintain effective strategic nuclear deterrent forces.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 26, 1996
Accession Number
ADA339646

Entities

People

  • Paul G. Kaminski

Organizations

  • Office Of The Under Secretary Of Defense

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Counter WMD
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Ballistic Missiles
  • Cold War
  • Engineering
  • Federal Budgets
  • Fleet Ballistic Missiles
  • Force Structure
  • Guidance
  • Inertial Navigation
  • Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
  • Military Budgets
  • National Security
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Propellants
  • Rockets
  • Submarines
  • United States

Readers

  • Civilian Systems Systems Program Capability Development and Upgrade Support Activity Expense and Pay Management.
  • Missile Defense Systems.
  • Systems Analysis and Design