Operational Protection of the Guadalcanal Operation Landings

Abstract

It has been argued that the operational commander's decision to withdraw the aircraft carrier-based operational protection earlier than planned at Guadalcanal placed the operation in extremis. The operational commander's decision as to what was necessary and possible to protect with the aircraft carriers was based on the means available and the risk involved. In view of the information he had his actions can be justified, but his overall command of the operation is subject to criticism. There were things that could have been done better, and there are lessons to be learned. In this paper I look at the issue of operational protection of the landing during the planning stage, and when the operational commander made the decision to withdraw it. Centers of gravity at all levels are considered in order to analyze the operations commander's decision. Lastly, I consider what the operations commander could have done better, and at the need to properly plan for operational protection in a future operation maneuver from the sea.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 13, 1998
Accession Number
ADA348452

Entities

People

  • Philip M. Henry

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Ground and Sea Platforms

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Aircrafts
  • Amphibious Operations
  • Cargo Ships
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Force Protection
  • Marine Corps
  • Marine Corps Operations
  • Military Operations
  • Military Strategy
  • Naval Operations
  • Navy
  • New York
  • Second World War
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies