Entry to USAF Undergraduate Flying Training
Abstract
Undergraduate flying training qualification and selection standards are closely examined for each of the major points of entry. Individuals who qualified and were selected for pilot and navigator training in 1995, 1996, and 1997 are described by gender and racial/ethnic subgroup. Observed differences in selection ratios for gender and racial/ethnic subgroups are statistically evaluated. Results indicate that selection for flying training is not contingent on gender. Selection is not contingent on racial/ethnic status on most occasions. For the Air Force Academy, Class of 1996, and for the Reserve Officer Training CorpC (ROTC), FY96 Board 1, pilot selection ratios for minority applicants are statistically significantly lower than those for majority applicants. Detailed analyses revealed that lower officership ratings, grade point averages, physical fitness test scores, and flight screening performance averages account for lower minority selection ratios on these occasions. Although cognitive ability test scores are used to express qualification minimums for some points of entry, ability test scores have little influence on pilot and navigator selection decisions. Recommendations are made to establish databases to allow observation of the limiting affects of flying training qualification standards and to revise ROTC selection procedures to minimize minority attrition during undergraduate flying training.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Aug 01, 1998
- Accession Number
- ADA354029
Entities
People
- Joseph L. Weeks
- Warren E. Zelenski
Organizations
- Air Force Research Laboratory