The Relationship Among Tasks, Centers of Gravity, and Decisive Point

Abstract

At the operational and strategic levels, military planners use the concepts of centers of gravity and decisive points to assist them in determining the best ways for accomplishing assigned tasks. By identifying the enemy's center of gravity, the planner determines the enemy assets that must be defeated to gain victory. On the other hand, by identifying the friendly center of gravity, the planner has determined the friendly assets that must be protected to retain freedom of action to attack the enemy's center of gravity. Since it may not be possible to directly attack enemy centers of gravity, friendly forces attack formations, positions, or support structures that lead directly to the center of gravity. These are referred to as decisive points. There is a hierarchical relationship among the assigned task, center of gravity for that task, and the decisive points on the path to the center of gravity. The given task is based upon the higher authority's desired outcome and is refined by the subordinate to become the unit's mission. The unit executing the mission determines the enemy and friendly centers of gravity based upon the mission/assigned task. The center of gravity chosen must be based upon the mission and can not be a generic center of gravity. If the chosen center of gravity is not based on the assigned task, accomplishing the mission probably will not compel the enemy to the desired action and may have far greater affects than desired. For example, the enemy's government may collapse leaving a vacuum rather than that government performing the desired action. This may happen anyway but if the action taken is limited by the desired endstate it is less likely to occur. This monograph discusses the military theory of centers of gravity and its relationship to assigned tasks and decisive points. United States' joint and individual service doctrines and historical examples frame the discussion of theory.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 21, 1998
Accession Number
ADA356944

Entities

People

  • Jeffrey A. Springman

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Counter WMD
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Engineered Resilient Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Defense
  • Air Force
  • Artillery
  • Civil War
  • Civil War (United States)
  • Combat Operations
  • Command And Control
  • Department Of Defense
  • Governments
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • National Governments
  • Naval Warfare
  • Navy
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • Education

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Team-Based Human-Centered Cognitive Task Decision Making and Information Performance.