Jerusalem and the Arab-Israeli Peace Process.

Abstract

The disposition of Jerusalem is among the handful of final status' issues to be negotiated between Israel and the PLO according to the 1993 Declaration of Principles (the Oslo Accord). This thesis argues that, unlike other final status issues that are more technical and bilateral in nature, the issue and symbolism of Jerusalem are so entangled in domestic political processes that negotiated, bilateral resolution has become virtually impossible. That is, Jerusalem has become a defining issue within both domestic Israeli and domestic Palestinian political discourse and processes that resolving it equitably has become problematic even in the best of circumstances. While there is no shortage of creative, viable plans to share Jerusalem, there is a shortage of the domestic political space necessary to negotiate its resolution. As a general rule, the more a disputed issue between polities becomes a domestic political issue within the polities, the less likely it becomes to resolve it through bilateral negotiations.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1998
Accession Number
ADA357544

Entities

People

  • Osman N. Soubagle

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Agreements
  • Boundaries
  • Christianity
  • Communities
  • Governments
  • International Law
  • Law
  • Middle East
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Negotiations
  • Political Negotiations
  • Political Parties
  • Security
  • Terrorists
  • United Nations
  • United States

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • East Asian Political and Security Studies within the Soviet Union
  • Educational Psychology
  • International Relations and Conflict Resolution

Technology Areas

  • Space