Planning and End State: Has Doctrine Answered the Need?

Abstract

The 1991 Coalition victory in Desert Storm exemplified the awesome capabilities of the U.S. Armed Forces weapons and doctrine. The Army's Air Land Battle doctrine was finally used in combat and proven effective. The short campaign ended with the near total destruction of Iraq's army and cost few American lives. Why then, does Iraq still threaten U.S. interests in the region? Was the war really as successful as thought or could the Coalition have done more to assure the future stability of the Persian Gulf region. This monograph examines the planning process used to formulate the Desert Storm plan in order to determine what end state planning was done. The essential questions to answer are what, if any, end state planning was done prior to the offensive, and, what U.S. Military doctrine existed to support end state planning at the time? The monograph then addresses what end state doctrine exists today and whether this is an adequate improvement over the doctrine existing during the war. The monograph begins with an examination of the overarching political goals and how these were linked to the military objectives. It continues with an examination of the offensive plan to determine how each subordinate unit mission was to support achievement of the stated objectives also noting that end state was not defined or even addressed in the plan. The monograph then moves into examining the actions of the units and commanders during the ground phase and how the decision to cease offensive operations was arrived at. This to determine if any well defined end state was sought, visualized, or recognized by the theater leadership or the National Command Authority. The monograph then proceeds with a short look at the end state doctrine in existence during Desert Storm then a look at the state of that doctrine today. There are four major conclusions of this monograph. First, a clearly defined and recognizable end state was not addressed in the Desert Storm plan.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 21, 1998
Accession Number
ADA357716

Entities

People

  • Emmett M. Schaill

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Counter WMD
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Defense
  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Civil War
  • Combatant Commanders
  • Command And Control
  • Department Of State
  • Deployment
  • Foreign Relations
  • Governments
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • National Security
  • United States
  • United States Central Command
  • Warfare
  • Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military and Counterinsurgency Studies.