The Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence in Court-Martial Proceedings.

Abstract

The Department of Defense exhibits a love-hate relationship with the polygraph machine. Although military examiners have performed over 370,000 polygraph examinations since 1981, not one was admitted into a military court-martial after 1991. At that time, the President promulgated Military Rule of Evidence 707, which declared that polygraph evidence was per se inadmissible in a military court-martial. However, when the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces announced the decision of United States V. Scheffer, 44 M.J. 442 (C.A.A.F. 1996), it declared that the per se exclusion of polygraph evidence, offered by the accused to rebut an attack on his credibility, without providing him an opportunity to lay a foundation for admission, violated his Sixth Amendment right to present a defense. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to the case and should hear oral arguments in the fall of 1997.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 11, 1999
Accession Number
ADA360055

Entities

People

  • John A. Carr

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Congress
  • Court Martial
  • Criminal Investigations
  • Criminal Justice System
  • Detectors
  • Drug Abuse
  • Employment
  • Governments
  • Judiciary
  • Law
  • Lysergic Acids
  • Personnel Management
  • Police
  • Psychology
  • Supreme Court
  • United States

Readers

  • Criminal Law
  • Strategic Security Studies