A New Millennium: A New Army-Congress Relationship

Abstract

The Army's current budget is not adequate to sustain its modest force structure and prepare for the future. Its budget has been locked at a 24 percent share of the DoD budget since the end of WWII, even though the Army has shouldered the load in contingency forces and casualties. The Army's senior leadership's lack of political acumen with Congress is in large part responsible for the Army's mouse's share of the DoD budget pie. Further, an underfunded Army has troubling implications for national security interests in the chaotic post Cold War era. If the Army doesn't change its corporate approach to Congress the warfighting capability and institutional integrity of the Army will be in mortal peril. This study attempts to place the Army's relationship with Congress in a larger context, one that must be understood if the Army is to attain the capabilities it needs to win in the future. The study begins with an analysis of the Army culture and values that drives the Army today and then examines Congress' perception of the Army and the Army's perception of Congress. It concludes with recommendations on how the Army must adapt to effectively engage Congress.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 23, 1999
Accession Number
ADA364571

Entities

People

  • Lauren S. Davis

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Cyber
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Civil War
  • Congress
  • Department Of Defense
  • Doctrine
  • General Officers
  • Governments
  • Law
  • Military Education
  • Military Science
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Personnel Management
  • Second World War
  • Students
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Economics
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Military Mobilization and Reserve Forces Studies.