Doctrine (Maybe), Strategy (No): Will the Air Force Implement a Force Protection Program?

Abstract

The US Air Force's response to the bombing of Khobar Towers in June 1996 was to consolidate and remove our forces to a more isolated (bare base) location in the Saudi desert. While a seemingly logical step, removing our forces from Saudi population areas means that determined future terrorists could employ weapons against US forces without the worry of collateral damage to Saudi nationals. There are many other questions that need answering about our organizailonal preparedness for a chemical or biological event. For example, in the event of such an attack, is the US civil engineering force trained and equipped for the decontamination of the attacked base and other bases? Does Air Force doctrine include recovery of a base from a chemical attack, or will we evacuate to a new toxic-free area and leave the attacked base and its resources behind? Are our anmen protected from building collapse? These kinds of questions prompt larger issues.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 01, 1999
Accession Number
ADA365510

Entities

People

  • James L. Lafrenz

Organizations

  • Air War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Biological Weapons
  • Chemical Weapons
  • Civil Engineering
  • Department Of Defense
  • Department Of State
  • Engineering
  • Engineers
  • Explosions
  • Explosives
  • Force Protection
  • Health Services
  • Terrorism
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare
  • Warning Systems

Readers

  • Irregular Warfare and Special Operations Cyberspace Operations against Adversarial Threats.
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Nuclear Non-Proliferation and International Security