Missile Defense: THADD Restructure Addresses Problems But Limits Early Capability.

Abstract

The contract for developing the interceptor was a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract, a contract type that placed all of the program's financial risk on the government and did not include provisions that could be used to hold the contractor accountable for less than optimum performance. Flight-test failures have been caused primarily by manufacturing defects rather than problems with advanced technology. These failures have prevented the Army from demonstrating that it can reliably employ the "hit-to-kill" technology critical to THAAD's success. The restructured program addresses each of the program's four underlying problems. It lengthens the flight-test schedule and increases ground testing; removes the requirement for the deployable, early prototype interceptors; increases the contractor's quality emphasis, including its commitment, leadership, and quality assurance staffing; and modifies the cost-plus-fixed-fee contract to provide performance-based incentives and penalties and introduces a degree of competition into the program.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1999
Accession Number
ADA366212

Entities

Organizations

  • United States Government Accountability Office

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Ballistic Missiles
  • Battle Management
  • Business Administration
  • Contractors
  • Defense Systems
  • Department Of Defense
  • Engineering
  • Flight Testing
  • Governments
  • Impact Point
  • Lessons Learned
  • Manufacturing
  • Military Personnel
  • Program Management
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Theater Ballistic Missiles

Readers

  • Defense Acquisition Program Management
  • Missile Defense Systems.
  • Software Engineering