A Meta-Analysis of the Relations among Training Criteria
Abstract
An augmented framework for training criteria based on Kirkpatricks' (1959a, 1959b, 1960a, 1960b) model divides training reactions into affective an utility reactions; and learning into posttraining measures of learning, retention, and behavior/skill demonstration. Meta-analysis results among criteria using this framework include the finding of substantial reliabilities across training criteria and reasonable convergence among subdivisions of criteria within a larger level. Utility-type reaction measures were more strongly related to learning or on-the-job performance (transfer) than affective-type reaction measures. Moreover. utility-type reaction measures were stronger correlates of transfer than were measures of immediate or retained learning. These latter findings support recent concurrent thinking regarding use of reactions in training (e.g., Warr & Bunce, 1995). Implications for choosing and developing training criteria are discussed.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- May 01, 1998
- Accession Number
- ADA368508
Entities
People
- Allison Shotland
- George M. Alliger
- Holly Traver
- Scott I. Tamnenbaum
- Winston Bennett Jr.