Five Precepts for the Air Component Commander When Air Power is Used in Coercive Diplomacy.

Abstract

Unquestionably, air power brings to bear some unique capabilities that no other military force can, particularly when used as a coercive diplomacy tool. To be used effectively though, a rational calculus needs to take place that considers air power's strengths as well as its weaknesses. Consideration of both sides of this equation is essential for the success of any air operation. With air power's increased use in this way, it is essential that the air component commander be as well versed as possible in this "new" mission. Too often, in today's age of crisis management, the operational commander has had to "wing it" in his attempt to use air power effectively and correctly in this, very dynamic, political context. An examination of a few recent case studies to determine what works, as well as to identify those possible instances where air power might not have been the correct military choice or was employed incorrectly, has produced a list of five precepts--principles that prescribe a particular course of action or conduct--that attempt to give the air component commander a baseline for planning. It is equally important that the air component commander advise the leadership of the possible risks where air power might not be the appropriate tool to use. These precepts are by no means all inclusive nor are they meant to be a definitive answer as additional lessons are being written right now in air operations abroad.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 17, 1999
Accession Number
ADA370748

Entities

People

  • Maurice H. Forsyth

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Counter WMD
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Defense
  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Aircrafts
  • Attrition
  • Information Warfare
  • Joint Military Activities
  • Military Operations
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Nato
  • New York
  • United States
  • Urban Areas
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Strategic Security Studies