An Overview of Jefferson Proving Ground UXO Technology Demonstration (Phase III) Contractor Performance Self-Assessments

Abstract

The self-evaluations of four participants in the Jefferson Proving Ground, IN, UXO (unexploded ordnance) Technology Demonstrations, Phase III (1996), were reviewed to better understand the factors that control detection and/or discrimination of buried UXO by surface instruments. Among the conclusions drawn was the fact that each participant relied more heavily on human experience than model-driven data analysis to distinguish UXO from other objects. Furthermore, the simple magnetic dipole models that were used by some participants were shown to be inadequate for accurately predicting depth of burial and UXO orientation in most cases. Data analysis techniques and model predictions are not yet sophisticated enough to allow UXO discrimination using total field magnetometry.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Nov 01, 1999
Accession Number
ADA371273

Entities

People

  • John O. Curtis

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Sensors
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Business Administration
  • Computer Programs
  • Contractors
  • Data Analysis
  • Detection
  • Detectors
  • Dipoles
  • Electromagnetic Induction
  • Electromagnetic Induction Sensors
  • Explosives
  • Magnetic Detection
  • Magnetic Dipoles
  • Magnetometers
  • Munitions
  • Unexploded Ammunition
  • Uxo Detection
  • Warning Systems

Readers

  • Military/Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Technology
  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.
  • Systems Analysis and Design