Vietnam: To Privatize or not to Privatize

Abstract

In 1986, the Vietnam leadership realized that the Maoist tradition of social transformation was contributing to the collapse of economic development in their country. Since that time, Vietnam has initiated two reforms, which focus on a market economy instead of a socialistic economy and have already served to boost their labor and capital productivity. The first reform is known as the New Economic Management Mechanism and the second reform is Doi Moi. By 1992, Vietnam was considered to be macro-economically stable from the efforts of these reforms and the new policies and practices ?egan to change the world's impression of their country. Despite Vietnam's recent success-poverty, hunger, and social inequality are still prevalent. In order to address these concerns1 Vietnam's leaders and policy makers have chosen to focus their efforts in four areas: 1. Competitive markets 2. Continued reforms of state-owned enterprises 3. Expenditure on human capital formation (i.e. health services, education, family planning) 4. Investment in physical infrastructure (i.e. power, conununications, transport, and irrigation)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 24, 1999
Accession Number
ADA373348

Entities

People

  • Greg Vinci

Organizations

  • United States Department of Defense

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Commerce
  • Economic Development
  • Economic Systems
  • Families (Human)
  • Governments
  • Health Services
  • Human Development
  • Human Resources
  • Industrial Production
  • Infrastructure
  • International Trade
  • Investments
  • Market Economy
  • Markets
  • Planned Economy
  • Productivity
  • Technology Transfer

Readers

  • Asian Economic Studies
  • Economics