Identifying Conceptual Skills of Future Battle Commanders

Abstract

This research was conducted to support the U.S. Army Research Institute-Fort Leavenworth Research Unit's ongoing DEVCOM program (Developing Commanders for the Future Battlefield). Specifically, this research was designed to supplement previous work done in the development of battle commanders' conceptual thinking (Fallesen, in preparation). The overall goal of this research was to identify, organize, and clarify examples of the conceptual skills that are important to the development of future battle commanders. Three data collections helped to develop a conceptual skills model called the S(3) (Situation Understanding, Simulation, Self regulation). The S(3) Model helped to filter previous lists by separating task specific Conceptual Skills ("what to think") from those conceptual skills centered on general aspects of thinking ("how to think"). Of all the data collected, the most useful information was found by considering the inconsistencies between importance ratings and personal,historical examples. Inconsistencies were found where officers would rate non-traditional conceptual skills low on importance, yet they would provide an example of where possessing such a skill was essential. In general, officers were unfamiliar with conceptual skills that are directly represented in tactical decision making procedures or the estimate of the situation.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 2000
Accession Number
ADA374875

Entities

People

  • Jon J. Fallesen
  • Shawn A. Noble

Organizations

  • U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Engineered Resilient Systems
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Army Personnel
  • Artillery
  • Climate Change
  • Cognition
  • Cognitive Workload
  • Doctrine
  • Military Operations
  • Military Personnel
  • Military Research
  • Pattern Recognition
  • Psychology
  • Reasoning
  • Social Sciences
  • Standards
  • Thinking
  • Training
  • United States

Fields of Study

  • Education

Readers

  • Military Training and Readiness Simulation
  • Systems Analysis and Design