U.S. Strategic Nuclear Policy and Force Structure: Three Analytical Approaches

Abstract

Since the end of the Cold War, the United States and Russia have made significant strides in reducing their nuclear arsenals. While the current political climate is significantly less tense than during the Cold War era, Russia is still the only country capable of destroying the United States. This thesis examines the current requirements shaping U.S. nuclear strategy, policy, and force structure in the three leading U.S. schools of thought (de-alerting, bilateral negotiations, and national missile defense). Additionally, the thesis evaluates the implications for the U.S. nuclear posture in the policy recommendations advanced by these schools. Each school proposes distinct solutions regarding strategic force structure based on its interpretation of the requirements at hand. The thesis concludes that de-alerting, theater and national ballistic missile defense, and bilateral negotiations schools of thought will continue to influence, both short-term and long-term, U.S. nuclear policy and force structure.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1999
Accession Number
ADA375933

Entities

People

  • Russell H. Wagner

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Counter WMD
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Anti-Ballistic Missiles
  • Arms Control
  • Arms Control Treaties
  • Ballistic Missiles
  • Command And Control
  • Defense Systems
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
  • International Relations
  • National Security
  • Negotiations
  • Nuclear Materials
  • Rockets
  • Strategic Weapons
  • Treaties
  • United States
  • Warning Systems

Readers

  • Strategic Security Studies