How the North Vietnamese Won the War: Operational Art Bends But Does Not Break in Response to Asymmetry

Abstract

This monograph analyzes the effectiveness of operational campaign design against an asymmetrical threat during the 1968 Tet Offensive. The focus is on conceptual elements of campaign design that are derived from theory, which incorporate the particulars of military history to the general truth of warfare. Effective campaign execution is dependent, in part, an effective campaign design that set of theoretical and doctrinal precepts that define the concerns of the operational planner. The monograph identifies lessons learned from this period that are applicable to current U.S. Joint and Army doctrine as well as lessons for planners and executors of U.S. military action under the American system of civilian control of the military. First, the monograph demonstrated the complex nature of asymmetric warfare. Finding and creating vulnerabilities and attacking those vulnerabilities with inherent strengths is the key to asymmetric warfare. Secondly, the monograph discussed the elements of campaign design that are derived from theory, which incorporate the particulars of military history to the general truth of warfare. Some of the common conceptual actions are to understand the type and scope of conflict, define the enemy and friendly center of gravity, identify possible culminating points, select lines of operation, determine decisive points, and understanding the dangers of paralysis commonly known as cybershock. The third section identifies the strategy and identifies particular military objectives identified by the North Vietnamese. The monograph offered three different assessments. The first was how the U.S. was an asymmetry threat to the PAVN and Vietcong. This assessment was base of strategic asymmetry using the forms of asymmetry that are method, will, and patience. The method that both opponents selected to fight the war is what caused the U.S. to be asymmetric to the PAVN and Vietcong.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 2001
Accession Number
ADA389402

Entities

People

  • Dale S. Ringler

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Asymmetric Warfare
  • Center Of Gravity
  • Combat Areas
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Conventional Warfare
  • Doctrine
  • Geography
  • Governments
  • Lessons Learned
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Urban Areas
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies