Combat Search and Rescue: Should it be a Joint Requirement?

Abstract

The genesis of this paper is based on the hypothesis that Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) is best optimized for the operational commander by being joint. With an increased emphasis on personnel recovery and a reduced force structure, the unique capabilities of the services should be combined to maximize effectiveness. Historical analysis from WWII until present day highlights the benefits and disadvantages of a single-service OSAR focus in comparison to a joint focus. This analysis reveals the joint character of many successful rescue operations. These lessons from the past will shape the manner in which OSAR will be conducted in the future, and also identify needed improvements in procedures, organization, and doctrine to do so. With a top-to-bottom joint focus in organization and doctrine, CSAR can utilize the unique character and tactics that each service brings to the joint force to enhance operational effectiveness.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 05, 2001
Accession Number
ADA389494

Entities

People

  • Darren T. Hansen

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Aircrafts
  • Attrition
  • Command And Control
  • Doctrine
  • Employment
  • Force Structure
  • Lessons Learned
  • Military Force Levels
  • Military Operations
  • Naval Warfare
  • Organizational Structure
  • Search And Rescue
  • Task Forces
  • United States Special Operations Command
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Irregular Warfare and Special Operations Cyberspace Operations against Adversarial Threats.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.