Confederate Strategy in 1863: Was a Strategic Concentration Possible?

Abstract

The National Military Strategy outlines the U.S. military concept for winning two nearly simultaneous Major Theaters of War: concentrate in one, shift assets to the second, and win the second. The U.S. doctrine calls for the use of decisive force in a concentration against its enemies. Army doctrine supports this concept as well. Army Field Manual 100-5 still includes the idea of concentration under the principle of war of mass. The origin of the U.S. military thinking on concentration comes from the beginnings of the Republic. After the Napoleonic Wars, there were two schools of thought: Archduke Charles and Jomini. Antoine Jomini advocated distribution as a necessary precursor to concentration. These schools of thought dominated pre-Civil War U.S. Army. The U.S. Army was oriented on a cordon defense. Jefferson Davis, having learned this during his time as the U.S. Secretary of War, attempted to implement a cordon defense when he became the President of the Confederacy. Other Confederate strategists advocated a Jominian concentration. One of the earliest was P. G. T. Beauregard, who generally suggested a concentration on the Tennessee theater. The Confederacy responded to the crises of 1862 with marginally successful strategic concentrations in Mississippi and Virginia Throughout the war, Davis countered attempts at form offensive concentrations with suggestions on a defensive concentrations to shore up threatened sectors. In the spring of 1863, Robert E. Lee suggested a decisive offensive concentration in Virginia for a campaign in Pennsylvania, which Lee believed could be the decisive campaign of he war. Davis accepted Lee's ideas on the campaign, but did not ensure adequate support for it. Confederacy had forces available before the campaign. The monograph uses five criteria to evaluate concentrations: distance, time, combat power, leadership, and purpose. The monograph uses the

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 15, 2000
Accession Number
ADA389820

Entities

People

  • D. J. White

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Case Studies
  • Civil War
  • Civil War (United States)
  • Doctrine
  • Engineering
  • Field Army
  • Geography
  • Governments
  • Military History
  • Military Science
  • Military Strategy
  • New York
  • North Carolina
  • Students
  • United States
  • United States Government
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • History

Readers

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.