ISSUE PAPER: What Do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us?

Abstract

During the past decade, several states have begun using the results on statewide tests as the basis for rewarding and sanctioning individual students, teachers, and schools. Although testing and accountability are intended to improve achievement and motivate staff and students, concerns have been raised in both the media and the professional literature (e.g., Heubert & Hauser, 1999; Linn, 2000) about possible unintended consequences of these programs. We conducted several analyses to examine the issue of whether TAAS scores can be trusted to provide an accurate index of student skills and abilities. First, we used scores on the reading and math tests that are administered as part of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) to investigate how much students in Texas have improved and whether this improvement is consistent with what has occurred nationwide. NAEP scores are a good benchmark for this purpose because they reflect national content standards and they are not subject to the same external pressures to boost scores as there are on the TAAS.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2000
Accession Number
ADA390516

Entities

People

  • Brian M. Stecher
  • Daniel F. Mccaffrey
  • Laura S. Hamilton
  • Stephen P. Klein

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accountability
  • Achievement Tests
  • California
  • Education
  • Electronic Mail
  • Ethnic Groups
  • Hispanics
  • Instructors
  • Mathematics
  • Measurement
  • Minority Groups
  • North Carolina
  • Schools
  • Standards
  • Statistics
  • Students
  • United States

Fields of Study

  • Education

Readers

  • Agent-Based Social Robotics and Mobile-Assisted Learning in Virtual Environments.
  • Organizational Psychology.
  • Theoretical Analysis.