USAF Aircraft Maintenance Management. Is There a Better Way?

Abstract

Aircraft maintenance performance has steadily declined since the Objective Wing organizational structure was implemented for the Tactical Air Forces (TAF). Is the Objective Wing the right organizational structure for aircraft maintenance? USAF maintenance management philosophies have changed numerous times. Over the past 50 years, the Air Force searched for an organization that maximized efficiency and performance. Reorganization has been the preferred method of gaining efficiency or performance. The focus of this research is to analyze past organizational structures to define key elements that affect maintenance performance and develop an organization that will improve maintenance performance. The research method is a historical analysis of tactical aircraft maintenance organizations in the USAF. The researcher found that there are three key elements that affect the organizational structure and its subsequent performance. Those elements are context, culture, and strategy. A maintenance organizational structure must be based on these enduring elements to succeed. A matrix organizational structure based on our current and expected context, culture, and strategy is proposed.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 2000
Accession Number
ADA393953

Entities

People

  • Charles D. Johnson

Organizations

  • Air Command and Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Force Personnel
  • Aircraft Maintenance
  • Department Of Defense
  • Governments
  • High Reliability
  • Logistics
  • Maintenance
  • Maintenance Management
  • Maintenance Personnel
  • Military Organizations
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personnel Management
  • Reliability
  • United States
  • United States Government
  • War Colleges

Fields of Study

  • Business
  • Engineering

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.