Can the U.S. Air Force Weaponize Space?
Abstract
The U.S. Air Force recently stated one of its core competencies is Air and Space Superiority- control over what moves through air and space. Can the Air Force realistically achieve a level of Space Superiority, via weaponization, given international law, U.S. National Space Policy, and politics? Or, given the Presidential veto of FY98 funds for Clementine II, Military Spaceplane, and Kinetic Energy Anti-Satellite (KE-ASAT), systems intended to support and enable Space Superiority, is the mention of Space Superiority merely rhetoric combined with wishful thinking? In trying to determine an answer to this question, several ideas for space control ranging from passive defense methods to active weaponization of space, such as a Space Based Laser (SBL), were considered. In the area of international law, both customary law and treaties were examined. The bottom line in this regard is the fact the United Nations Charter allows a country to defend itself and its property, even in space. On the other hand, the Anti Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty doesn't allow space based missile defenses. Finally, after examining several prospective space weaponization programs of interest to the Air Force, the common thread amongst the past and present politically acceptable programs is "who wields the most power." The only course the Air Force can take under the circumstances is to lean as far forward as possible with space weapon ideas while awaiting the political consensus to move ahead. This consensus could come from a proactive interpretation like used for Reagan's SDI, or a significant emotional event such as an attack on U.S. satellites.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Apr 01, 1998
- Accession Number
- ADA397152
Entities
People
- David W. Mcfaddin
Organizations
- Air War College