Evaluation of Cross-Cultural Models for Psychological Operations: Test of a Decision Modeling Approach

Abstract

Specific research objectives were to identify sample psychological operations (PSYOP) objectives likely to be sought in traditional wartime operations and from operations other than war; for two sample objectives, to identify cultural and situational factors that would influence a likelihood that a target audience (TA) would respond as desired; to determine if a policy-capturing methodology would result in a policy model that could assess the probability of a TA responding as desired under varying conditions; and to examine the degree that relationship of factors and TA response is consistent across cultures and situations. Comparisons of relative influence of factors across/within cultures showed moderate but inconsistent agreement between subjects/cultures. In general, decision analysis procedures proved to be easily implemented. From these results, there is strong indication that relevant influencing factors can be pre-identified for specific PSYOP objectives. However, additional research over a larger number of objectives/cultures is required to see if these results are generalized to different types of operations and target audiences.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 2001
Accession Number
ADA400796

Entities

People

  • Brice Stone
  • Bryan Karabaich
  • Jerry Barucky

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Agreements
  • Air Force
  • Air Force Research Laboratories
  • Databases
  • Decision Support Systems
  • Information Operations
  • Information Systems
  • Military Operations
  • National Security
  • Operations Research
  • Personnel Management
  • Psychological Operations
  • Psychological Warfare
  • Psychology
  • Regression Analysis
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Irregular Warfare and Special Operations Cyberspace Operations against Adversarial Threats.
  • Organizational Psychology.