Comparison of Bubbler Versus Sorbent Tube Sampling for the Analysis of GB (Sarin) Vapor for Inhalation Toxicology

Abstract

Previous GB (sarin) inhalation studies have typically used solvent bubblers to determine vapor concentrations, particularly at lethal exposure levels. However, investigations for future low-level GB exposures necessitate the need for a sampling system more sensitive than bubblers. To meet this requirement, an automated sorbent tube/thermal desorption system was tested and validated against sample bubblers. Data was obtained during an existing GB inhalation exposure study with vapor concentrations ranging from 2 to 7 mg/m3 GB. Samples from both techniques were drawn from the same inhalation chamber and quantitatively analyzed by gas chromatography for GB vapor. Concentrations derived from each sampling method were compared against each other and statistically evaluated. A paired t-test of the data showed no statistical difference between the two methods at the 95% confidence interval. Future applications of the sorbent tube sampler would include monitoring GB levels approaching the TLV-TWA of 0.0001 mg/m3.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 01, 2002
Accession Number
ADA400830

Entities

People

  • H. Dupont Durst
  • J. S. Anthony
  • Leonard C. Buettner
  • Robert J. Mioduszewski
  • William T. Muse Jr.

Organizations

  • Edgewood Chemical Biological Center

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Calibration
  • Chemical Warfare
  • Chemical Warfare Agents
  • Chemical Weapons
  • Chromatography
  • Control Systems
  • Desorption
  • Detectors
  • Gas Chromatography
  • Intervals
  • Mass Flow
  • Monitoring
  • Rodents
  • Sampling
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Toxicology

Fields of Study

  • Environmental science

Readers

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Regression Analysis.