Aerospace Expeditionary Force Implementation and the Effect on Team Cohesion

Abstract

A statistical analysis of deployed and deploying airmen was conducted to provide insight and defensible support for Aerospace Expeditionary Force Center commanders to base teaming initiatives and policy decisions. To ensure that the results of this research are applicable across the Air Force, the research examined the effect of the Aerospace Expeditionary Force deployment process, comprised of individual anxiety, group unity, and work-group characteristics, on team cohesion, deployment commitment, and team effectiveness. The sample obtained included 643 airmen who had deployed within a 12-month period or who were scheduled to deploy within the next 3-month period. The results of the study indicate that the Aerospace Expeditionary Force team deployment process has indeed positively affected team cohesion and perceived team effectiveness. These results were found to be positive regardless of whether individuals deployed as teams from the same base or as individuals from separate bases. These findings indicate that it may be satisfactory to deploy individuals by themselves, but that commanders should take all measures necessary to avoid doing so as the deployment commitment and perceived team effectiveness relationship is positively affected by individuals deploying as a team and negatively affected by individuals deploying by themselves.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 2002
Accession Number
ADA401021

Entities

People

  • Michael J. Zuhlsdorf

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Force Personnel
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Databases
  • Electronic Mail
  • Employment
  • Families (Human)
  • Information Science
  • Management Personnel
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personnel Management
  • Psychology
  • United States Central Command
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Naval Mine Countermeasure Systems Development.
  • Organizational Process Management (OPM).

Technology Areas

  • Space