Joint Military Engineers- Shaping the Combatant Commander's Area of Responsibility
Abstract
There are advantages of using Military Engineers rather than alternate institutions to shape the Combatant Commander's Area of Responsibility. This study will examine the differences between the U.S. Military Engineers, the State Department, and non-governmental organizations in their ability to conduct infrastructure development during peacetime. The study will also explore the origins of the nation-building program to uncover why these programs were developed and what their initial objectives were. The study will then trace the evolution of the National Command Authorities engagement strategy to highlight how subtle changes over time have altered the original definition of engagement and whether or not these changes have caused a deviation from the original concept. The background discussion will set the stage for a contrast and comparison of the capabilities for infrastructure development within each service, the Department of State, and several non-governmental organizations. Due to the complexity and the scope of engagement, this study will focus on infrastructure development issues only. The study will conclude with an assessment addressing whether or not Joint Military Engineers are more capable for this type of mission than other agencies. In addition the study will offer recommendations for improvements necessary for maintaining program relevance, and some that are beneficial.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Apr 01, 2001
- Accession Number
- ADA401402
Entities
People
- John E. Young
Organizations
- Marine Corps University