On Politics and Airpower

Abstract

Airpower advocates point to the exponential increases in precision, stealth and power of modern air systems as proof positive of a new era in warfare. Yet such claims cannot be isolated from the political objective airpower ultimately serves. This paper explores the advantages and disadvantages of the strategic employment of airpower from a political perspective. The inherent political advantages are introduced first along with a summary of current strategic airpower theory. Next some of the limitations of strategic airpower are explored with examples. Finally, the political employment of U.S. strategic airpower is summarized for each major conflict from World War II to Kosovo to illustrate how politics and airpower interact at the strategic level. Politics often drives strategy, playing to both airpower's strengths and weaknesses. The author concludes that while the advantages of modern U.S. airpower make it an obvious choice for achieving national objectives, political leaders need to be aware of the long term cost and limitations of reliance on airpower as a strategic means.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 09, 2002
Accession Number
ADA401916

Entities

People

  • Bradley J. Smith

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Engineered Resilient Systems
  • Human Systems
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Bombing
  • Civil War
  • Combat Forces
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Intergovernmental Organizations
  • International Organizations
  • Military Force Levels
  • Military Organizations
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Satellite Guided Weapons
  • Second World War
  • Tactical Air Support
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare
  • Weapons Effects

Readers

  • Strategic Security Studies