DOD Management: Examples of Inefficient and Ineffective Business Processes

Abstract

Both of these case studies highlight significant differences between DOD's business operations and those of two benchmark companies. These differences offer stark contrasts in the efficiency and cost of doing business. With regard to our first case study, for the inventory management process related to JSLIST, stovepiped, nonintegrated systems and processes result in DOD, the military services, and the military units not knowing how many items they have and where they are located. This lack of visibility has resulted in DOD excessing and selling JSLIST while at the same time procuring hundreds of thousands of new garments annually. The lack of system integration, meaning the ability to share data across business applications, continues to force multiple manual data entry into numerous systems. These manual processes result in errors, add significant administrative cost, and generally exacerbate asset visibility problems. Although the purchase card process was somewhat automated, we identified inefficient duplication of efforts and costly manual entry of data at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)-Columbus which sometimes resulted in processing fees well in excess of the cost of the item purchased.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 25, 2002
Accession Number
ADA403066

Entities

People

  • David R. Warren
  • Gregory D. Kutz

Organizations

  • United States Government Accountability Office

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Business Administration
  • Contract Administration
  • Contracts
  • Control Systems
  • Department Of Defense
  • Governments
  • Information Systems
  • Inventory Control
  • Logistics
  • Management Personnel
  • Money
  • Organizational Structure
  • Procurement
  • Supply Chain
  • Supply Chain Management

Readers

  • Defense Acquisition Program Management
  • Economics
  • Government Contracting/Procurement.