European Missile Defense - Issues and Options

Abstract

The NATO reaction to the September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States underscores the heightened European recognition of threats to Western security originating from beyond the borders of member nations. Nonetheless the European Allies remain wary of plans to extend missile defenses to their continent. In trying to change attitudes toward missile defense within NATO the administration will need to consider European interests and political and economic realities. The United States should not try to force missile defense on Europe. Nor should this issue be viewed as an exclusively NATO project or a test of Allied fealty. At the same time the Allies need to face the potentially damaging consequences of remaining vulnerable to ballistic missile attack while the United States builds defenses against such a threat. Hammering out a responsible NATO missile defense policy will be far more difficult if the transatlantic debate becomes polarized between those who believe Europe will never agree to missile defenses and those who argue that the continent must be protected regardless of its own wishes.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2002
Accession Number
ADA403479

Entities

People

  • Richard D. Sokolsky

Organizations

  • National Defense University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Defense
  • Anti-Ballistic Missiles
  • Ballistic Missiles
  • Black Sea
  • Boost Phase
  • Command And Control
  • Continents
  • Defense Systems
  • Europe
  • Ground Based
  • Homeland Security
  • National Security
  • Sea Based
  • Security
  • Terminal Defense
  • Theater Missile Defense
  • United States

Readers

  • Ballistic Missile Meteorology
  • International Relations and European Studies
  • Strategic Security Studies