Statistical vs Analytical Significance: Is My Model Good Enough?

Abstract

The credibility of M&S used in the system acquisition process is crucial to informed use of those models in support of system design, T&E and training. The key to affordable VV&A activities is to focus V&V efforts on the part of the model that's important to your problem. Analytical significance is the key criterion for M&S comparison with test data, where the comparison is based on acceptance criteria that are determined by analyzing your M&S application. By taking this approach we can go beyond tests of statistical significance to tests of whether the model is good enough for what the user needs it to do. V&V for its own sake is never cost-effective, but V&V conducted to support a specific problem focuses those activities on key analytical issues and makes the process efficient and cost-effective. So ultimately, the answer to the question, 'How much V&V do I need to determine if my model is good enough'? Is 'It depends on what you want the model to do'!

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Aug 01, 2001
Accession Number
ADA405565

Entities

Organizations

  • Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Configuration Management
  • Costs
  • Defense Systems
  • Department Of Defense
  • Life Cycles
  • Military Operations
  • Military Personnel
  • Miss Distance
  • Operations Research
  • Procurement
  • Radar Tracking
  • Simulations
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Test Facilities
  • Validation

Readers

  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Software Engineering.
  • Theoretical Analysis.