Language and the Localization of Objects in Space

Abstract

This research investigated people's ability to recognize configurations in space from different points of view under both uni- and multi-tasking conditions. Past research suggested that people might perform this kind of problem solving using either mental rotation or covert verbal descriptions. We hypothesized that use of these two strategies night depend on the verbal discriminability of the spatial scene. We also hypothesized that the strategy chosen might depend on the performance of a concurrent task. Specifically, in attempting to reduce processing interference, we predicted that people would be more likely to use mental rotation when the concurrent task they were involved in was verbal rather than spatial; conversely, they would be more likely to use verbal descriptions when the concurrent task was spatial rather than verbal. These hypotheses were supported in a series of experiments in which we measured people's time to decide whether spatial configurations displayed from different perspectives were the same or different, while they perspectives various types of concurrent tasks.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 2002
Accession Number
ADA409507

Entities

People

  • Phillip M. Wolff

Organizations

  • University of Memphis

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Cognitive Science
  • Department Of Defense
  • Disparities
  • Electronic Mail
  • Hypotheses
  • Information Operations
  • Language
  • Mental Processes
  • Military Personnel
  • Military Research
  • Psychology
  • Reaction Time
  • Recognition
  • Rotation
  • Students
  • Universities

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.
  • Sensor Fusion and Tracking Systems.
  • Team-Based Human-Centered Cognitive Task Decision Making and Information Performance.

Technology Areas

  • Space