Diagnostic Reasoning Model Validation in Digestive Endoscopy

Abstract

The development of a computer-assisted diagnostic system in digestive endoscopy implies to understand the reasoning process of endoscopists. The aim of this study is to validate a reasoning model and a knowledge base previously defined. Eight endoscopists have participated to a diagnostic test including 5 video-sequences and using a "thinking aloud" method. The physician discourse was compared with the knowledge base content. Forty requests, built with indices extracted from endoscopist talks were submitted to the diagnostic research system. The main results show that the endoscopists evoke all the information files defined in the knowledge base. Endoscopists well distinguish the endoscopic findings and diagnoses. They combine data-driven and hypothesis-driven approaches during the diagnostic process. Faced to complex diagnostic problem solving, they promote an analytical approach. The 40 requests have led to the correct finding class, as unique or first response in 25, second or other rank response in 12, and failed to recognize the lesion in 3 cases. These results are consistent with the reasoning model and the knowledge base content. They suggest several ways for improving the diagnostic aid system, the research approach as well as the user interface.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 25, 2001
Accession Number
ADA411883

Entities

People

  • B. Solaiman
  • C. Le Guillou
  • H. Gouerou
  • J. M. Cauvin
  • M. Robaszkiewicz

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Algorithms
  • Classification
  • Computers
  • Consistency
  • Electronic Mail
  • Endoscopy
  • Engineering
  • Health Services
  • Hospitals
  • Literature Surveys
  • Military Research
  • Reasoning
  • Standards
  • Statistical Analysis
  • User Interface
  • Validation

Fields of Study

  • Medicine

Readers

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Oncology and Biomarker-Based Cancer Detection.