The Effects of Individual Differences in Cognitive Styles on decision-Making Accuracy and Latency

Abstract

How might individuals' typical decision-making styles affect the quality and latency of their decisions? In a first study, 48 adults completed three measures of cognitive styles, including the Personal Need for Structure and Personal Fear of Invalidity scales (PNS and PFI; Thompson, Naccarato, Parker, & Moskowitz, 2001), and the Need for Cognition scale (NFC; Cacioppo & Petty, 1982). Participants then completed three trials of a medium-fidelity simulation of a naval surveillance and threat assessment task called TITAN (i.e., "Team and Individual Threat Assessment Network") that required participants to evaluate seven pieces of information for potential targets displayed in a radar space (e.g., direction, speed, bearing, etc.). After reviewing the information for each target, participants submitted their threat assessment and were provided feedback about the degree of actual threat for the target. For each session, participants were instructed to clear the radar space of as many targets as possible within a 25-minute period and to perform this operation as accurately as possible. Results showed a significant decrease in processing time across trials. Higher NFC scores predicted a significantly smaller mean decision error across trials, and higher PNS scores predicted a greater mean decision error, although the latter effect failed to reach statistical significance. None of the cognitive styles scores had a significant main effect on the mean time spent processing TITAN targets. In Study 2, 80 Canadian Forces personnel completed the three cognitive styles measures and worked in four-person teams on TANDEM 11, a simulation similar to TITAN. Each team consisted of three subordinates who separately reviewed and integrated five pieces of complex information per target before forwarding their individual threat assessments to a team leader. The team leader then assessed the veridicality of the three assessments and integrated them into a final threat assessment for each7

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 01, 2003
Accession Number
ADA412182

Entities

People

  • Ann-renee Blais
  • Joseph V. Baranski
  • Megan M. Thompson

Organizations

  • Defence Research and Development Canada

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Cognition
  • Descriptive Analytics
  • Errors
  • Factor Analysis
  • Feedback
  • Information Science
  • Judgment
  • Personality
  • Psychology
  • Regression Analysis
  • Reliability
  • Simulations
  • Statistics
  • Students
  • Surveillance
  • Threat Evaluation

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Missile Defense Systems.
  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.
  • Team-Based Human-Centered Cognitive Task Decision Making and Information Performance.

Technology Areas

  • Space
  • Space - Space Objects