The Cancellation of Crusader: A Study in the Dynamics of Decision-Making
Abstract
Every day key decisions are made within the United States governmental structure. It is critical, as both the Department of Defense and Department of the Army transform for the 21st century, that decisions are made using the best possible advice and input from key leaders at all levels. To an outside observer, several recent decisions were made without consulting with key Army leadership and/or devoid of valuable input. Instead, the decisions were made solely by the Department of Defense and became directive in nature. Using the Crusader artillery weapon system as an example, this study will examine the genesis of Crusader, viable options as an alternative for the replacement of the Crusader artillery system, major players in the decision-making process, the opposing views in this debate and finally how the decision was made. Reviewing this decision-making process, the study will draw conclusions as to whether the process was effective in this particular case study or the decision-making process was flawed.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Apr 07, 2003
- Accession Number
- ADA414123
Entities
People
- James L. Davis
Organizations
- United States Army War College