A Strategic Examination of the Punitive Expedition into Mexico, 1916-1917

Abstract

This thesis examines the strategy of the United States Army's Punitive Expedition into Mexico following the raid on Columbus, New Mexico, by Francisco Pancho Villa and his followers on 9 March 1916. In analyzing this topic, the thesis focuses on the roles and inter-relationship of the three men most responsible for the strategic direction of the campaign. President Woodrow Wilson, Secretary of War Newton Diehl Baker, and Chief of Staff of the Army Hugh Scott all played essential roles in the formation, conduct, and ultimate outcome of the expedition. This study analyzes the orders authorizing the expedition, and the limitations placed on the actions of the U.S. forces in Mexico by President Wilson and War Department officials. This study concludes that the Punitive Expedition, although largely an operational success, was a strategic miscalculation and the potential benefits of the operation did not outweigh the risks of triggering a general war with Mexico. A major war with Mexico was narrowly averted on two occasions by the actions of Major General Scott and the steadfast determination of President Wilson.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2003
Accession Number
ADA416074

Entities

People

  • John M. Cyrulik

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Agreements
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Department Of State
  • Foreign Policy
  • Foreign Relations
  • Governments
  • Military Applications
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • New Mexico
  • Personnel Management
  • Test And Evaluation
  • United States
  • United States Military Academy
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • History

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Oceanography.
  • Strategic Security Studies