ABS Rules versus Reliability Based Design of Bulk Carriers: A Comparative Analysis of Ship Design Approaches

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of the ABS Rules approach for ship design to the recently developed LRFD Reliability Based Design approach. Three elements of the design process are used for comparison. These are the Bottom Plating Thickness, the Bottom Longitudinal Section Modulus and the Hull Section Modulus. The development of the calculations is shown to help understand how the results are achieved. The results are compared in various configurations, which are included in the appendices for reference. The comparisons are evaluated with regard to how well the LRFD results compare to the ABS results for different design criteria. Conclusions are made concerning the relevance of these comparisons to the effort of advocating a move towards LRFD Reliability Based Design procedures. Finally, software development is discussed with a view to the future acceptance of the new approach and the initiation of a transition to LRFD Reliability Based Design procedures.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 2003
Accession Number
ADA419558

Entities

People

  • Joseph M. O'sullivan

Organizations

  • University of California, Berkeley

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Bending Moments
  • Bending Stress
  • California
  • Civil Engineering
  • Design Criteria
  • Engineering
  • Engineers
  • Materials
  • Naval Architecture
  • New York
  • Probability
  • Ship Design
  • Shipbuilding
  • Software Development
  • Spreadsheet Software
  • Tensile Strength
  • Yield Strength

Fields of Study

  • Engineering

Readers

  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Plasma Physics.
  • Software Engineering